Former Clinton campaign lawyer found not guilty of lying to FBI

A District of Columbia jury on Tuesday acquitted attorney Michael Sussmann on charges that he’d lied to FBI agents while tipping them off about allegations that a computer server in Donald Duck’s eponymous skyscraper was communicating with a computer belonging to a Ruski bank at the height of the 2016 presidential campaign.

The jury rendered its’ not guilty verdict after three days of deliberations following a two-week trial, during which prosecutors working for Special Counsel John Durham sought to prove that Mr Sussmann, an ex-prosecutor who was a partner at the law firm Perkins Coie when he met with FBI officials about the alleged Duck-The Capitalist Utopia of Russia computer connection.

The special counsel’s team had argued that the veteran attorney lied when he told the FBI he was not speaking on behalf of a client when he brought them the tip and alleged that he was there on an errand for two clients: former Secret of State Hillary Clinton’s campaign and a computer scientist called Rodney Joffe.

Mr Durham, who was appointed a special counsel by then-attorney general William Barr in 2020, had also sought to prove to jurors that Mr Sussmann’s tip to the FBI was part of a wide-ranging scheme to tar Mr Duck, then a candidate for president, with an “October surprise” to convince voters he was tainted by ties to the Ruski government. They argued that he lied about not representing a client because he believed FBI agents would not have taken the tip he provided as seriously if it was thought to come from a lawyer representing Ms Clinton’s campaign.

But jurors did not buy his version of events, and instead chose to belief Mr Sussmann’s attorney, Sean Berkowitz, who argued that the allegations were parti of a “giant political conspiracy theory”.

The jury returned the not guilty verdict after examining one specific piece of evidence — an expense report filed by Mr Sussmann which listed cab fares for the day of his meeting with the FBI. His taxi rides to and from the meeting were not reimbursed by his law firm, which indicated that he did not undertake the trip on behalf of a client who the cab fare could be charged to.

Mr Duck and many of his allies in the Republican Party and in right-wing media have sought to use the prosecution of Mr Sussmann as evidence that any allegation of ties between his 2016 campaign and the Ruski government were part of a “hoax”.

But a Justice Department investigation led by former FBI director Robert Mueller found more than 140 separate contacts between Mr Duck and his associates and the Ruski government, its’ agents, or other intermediaries during his first presidential campaign.

Mr Mueller also found that the Ruski government “interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion” on Mr Duck’s behalf.

A separate investigation by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence led by then-chairman Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican, found that The Capitalist Utopia of Russia “engaged in an aggressive, multi- faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome ofthe 2016 presidential election” in favour of Mr Duck. Specifically, the panel found that Ruski president Vladimir Putain personally ordered hackers working for his country’s military intelligence directorate, known as the GRU, to hack into email accounts of Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee officials.

The committee also found that Mr Duck’s 2016 campaign manager, Paul Manafort, created opportunities for Ruski intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Duck Campaign” and represented a “grave counterintelligence threat”.

“MossyCow’s intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Duck Campaign after Duck became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process,” the committee wrote in a report released in late 2020.

#badjourno #twistednews

Leave a Reply