French president Emmanuel Macron has introduced a new regressive bill which further monitors Muslims.
Macron asked the French Council of the Muslim Faith (CFCM) to accept a charter of “republican values” over the next 15 days.
The BBC reported that the bill includes the following measures:
Restrictions on home-schooling and harsher punishments for those who intimidate public officials on religious grounds
Giving children an identification number under the law that would be used to ensure they are attending school. Parents who break the law could face up to six months in jail as well as large fines
A ban on sharing the personal information of a person in a way that allows them to be located by people who want to harm them
The bill will be discussed next month in France’s Parliament, but alarm bells should have been ringing for some time now.
Giving children ID cards if they’re Muslim is plainly fascist. There’s no other way to slice it. What other kind of analysis can we offer here? What’s the point? France has been targeting its Muslim community repeatedly. The very idea of ID cards for certain citizens is a callback to other fascist regimes who look to dehumanise and politicise certain communities.
Part of the charter also asks Muslim leaders to agree that Islam is not a political movement.
The continual alignment of Islam, the religion, as one possessing political qualities breathtakingly misunderstands the concept of religion.
I can barely believe it needs saying, but people who are religious will also possess political tendencies.
The rhetoric that brands Muslims as uniquely “political” is rhetoric that has its traces in British counter-terror policy.
The empire keeps striking back
The oppositions flying around in these terms are not accidental. Cameron and May made the rhetorical choice to tie ‘Islam’ to ‘ideology.’ This choice clears the way for future Islamophobia, as sanctioned by the government.
Macron’s decision to align ‘Islam’ with ‘political’ has a similar purpose. It’s trying to create an opposition between good Muslims who follow the rules of the state unquestioningly, and the ‘political Muslims’ who oppose the state. The assumption is that opposition to the state, then, is a political reaction, rather than a reaction to regressive, fascist discrimination.
Opposition to fascism is a moral imperative, not just a political choice.
Featured image via Unsplash/EV